Eco Friendly Fish: Do Quotas Keep Fishing Sustainable?
Does restricting the number of certain threatened fish from being brought to land help them?
By making a fixed level for fishing fleets to ‘land’ and sell certain fish was implemented with the intention of making sure that over-fishing at peak breeding times, migration overload, and where numbers we low was restricted.
This, in theory, means that where fish are threatened most (i.e; where over-fishing could irreversibly damage the breeding population as a whole) there are restrictions in place to stop fishermen from expoliting them when they are at their most vulnerable.
However, it doesn’t quite work out like that.
It’s All In The Small Print:
The first problem is that fishing quotas are only applicable when the fish are taken ashore to be weighed and cold, so that officials at the ports can tell who has caught what fish, where and when.
Secondly, fishing nets are not species specific – they aren’t even fish specific – and most fish, mammals and crustaceans die trapped in nets waiting for the fishermen to collect them.
So; if you have gone over your ‘landable’ cod quotas, but just happen to have found 100 dead cod trapped in your nets – what are you going to do with them?
Option 1: Take them back to shore and risk a huge fine?
Option 2: Stay at sea until you have eaten them all?
Option 3: Throw them overboard, dead?
I’m afraid the answer is Option 3. All these dead fish that were accidently caught in nets are wasted needlessly – ironically caught in this ‘quota’ trap.
So What Is The Answer?
Unfortunately, this isn’t an easy one. Allowing ‘already dead, by-product’ cod to be taken ashore rather than wasted would be a sneaky loophole that fishermen could use to go out and just catch cod anyway.
However, allowing them to be killed anyway and just thrown away is the very anti-thesis of setting up the quotas anyway – I mean what good are dead fish at creating a sustainable fishery?
It is very easy when you hear some good news; “we are putting a limit on the number of certain endangered fish from being used for human food” to somehow allow it to be translated in our heads as: “fisherman can’t catch too much of threatened fish species”.
We failed to think of all the others things that this statement means: It means that fishermen will still be overfishing other fish not in the quota; it also doesn’t change the fact that we already ‘accidently’ catch and kill dozens of other aqautic species that are not financially viable to take to shore (boats are only so big); and it doesn’t even mention what would happen to any of the fish they caught if they have reached that quota?
But, thankfully, someone has. Someone (who luckily happened to be the very famous and very influential Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall) has now made this needless waste of threatened fish and other marine life public, and even has a campaign in place to help us all do something about it!
Visit his well chosen website: www.fishfight.net, join the likes of Stephen Fry and Richard Branson, and do you part for the fish!
You can also watch his recent documentary on this topic – and get some really great tips on sustainable shopping too!

photo credit: derekkeats